The assignment for this Ethics phase was to inspection Mr. Jacobs treatment, as expound by the New York State instruction on Quality of awe for the Mentally disabled (1994). The line was further asked to comment on the weigh issues for each of the three perspectives. The agencies, family and review board were to be included. This scholar will begin with a fourth perspective; that of Mr. Gordon. In the takings of Jacob Gordon (1994), is the story of the last octet years of a psychiatrically disabled mans life. Mr. Gordon appeared to quiver between striving for autonomy and accepting the support of his family. Unfortunately, it appeared by this bill that the families support was non synonymous with autonomy. It did non appear that Mr. Gordon had ever desired or privation agency intervention for himself. Mr. Gordons tie with the mental wellness system appeared to be articulate by power and mark off issues. Consumers/ex-patients often report a feeling of invisibility; they tang that their views and desires do non count (Carling, 1995, p.79 ). The commissions report (1995) spoke of some(prenominal) incidences where Mr. Gordon eluded to his desire for autonomy. Mr. Gordon did non coveting to live in a supervise setting. Mr. Gordon did not wish to attend separate day treatment settings. Mr.
Gordon did not wish to use medicament in the treatment of his mental health disorder. Without medication his fashion was deemed unacceptable and did not permit him the opportunity to perplex each of these choices. Choice is a right-not a privilege to be afforded by thoroughly behavior (Penny, 1994, p. 29). Mr. Gordons right of choice was hold even though he lived in his apartment independently. The discipline of his apartment was scrutinized. His medication was closely monitored; sometimes to the distributor point that he was... If you compulsion to get a replete(p) essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper